English Committee for Dialogue and Communication
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
English Committee for Dialogue and Communication

«يا أيها الناس إنّا خلقناكم من ذكر وأنثى وجعلناكم شعوبا وقبائل لتعارفوا إن أكرمكم عند الله أتقاكم إن الله عليم خبير »
 
PortalPortal  HomeHome  GalleryGallery  SearchSearch  Latest imagesLatest images  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
» Death link to too much red meat
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeFri Oct 02, 2009 6:04 am by serena07

» TOEFL Basics - Introduction to TOEFL iBT
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeThu Jul 09, 2009 11:01 am by Mohamed LAHRI

» TOEFL ibt Example conversation
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeThu Jul 09, 2009 10:59 am by Mohamed LAHRI

» TOEFL speaking question 2 sample answers
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeThu Jul 09, 2009 10:54 am by Mohamed LAHRI

» When you do exist...
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeSun Jun 21, 2009 1:30 pm by OULGOUT Abdelouahed

» Edward Said, "The Myth of the Clash of Civilizations" 1
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeSat Jun 13, 2009 2:16 pm by Mohamed LAHRI

» The Dialogue of Civilizations ( Dr. Badawi's Opening Statements - 1 of 3 )
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeSat Jun 13, 2009 2:12 pm by Mohamed LAHRI

» Cultural Diversity and the supposed Civilizational Communication
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeFri Jun 12, 2009 11:14 am by OULGOUT Abdelouahed

» Teaching Young Inspectors
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeFri Jun 12, 2009 11:05 am by OULGOUT Abdelouahed

» girls and smoking
The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeFri Jun 12, 2009 4:57 am by stoon

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Forum

 

 The myth of nobility

Go down 
3 posters
AuthorMessage
OULGOUT Abdelouahed

OULGOUT Abdelouahed


Number of posts : 6
Registration date : 2009-01-16

The myth of nobility Empty
PostSubject: The myth of nobility   The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeSat Apr 25, 2009 5:24 am

The myth of nobility Clip_i11
Many of the norms people are used to were a set of abnormal beliefs and practices. The tendency to hold power, status, and fame was and is still one of the most predominant triggers of society’s irrational mind. The later becomes tangible via the normalization of the abnormal on the account of the norms, which must be determined by heavenly standards out of time and place: revelation. Yet, the norms of the earth have managed to betray people’s conceptions and prompt them to shape truth in accordance with their doubts and surmises. The chief drive of these mentalities is the interest in its earthly and narrow version. Yet, such mentalities may resort to revelation in case it serves their greed, overlooking any sense of reasonableness and rationality. This is to say that norms have no just standards or rational criteria to refer to, yet the manifold myths and illusions they make up are so numerous. One of which is the notion of “nobility”, referred to in Arabic as “Charaff”. As for The common and prevailing myth among our norms, a person is known to be “Chariff” if only if he traces back, biological speaking, to the family of the prophet (PBUH) or his companions, may Allah bless them all. Regardless of whether this belonging is possible to trace or not, it’s definitely deceptive and astray to believe that biological belonging does make a value difference between people, and so make some of them “noble”/superior and others “slaves”/inferior. Have blood, heredity and other biological traits ever been a standard of “Charaff” in Islam? Sure, they will when pigs fly! The fact is that all people are equal like the teeth of the comb, or as the prophet Mohamed (PBUH) stated. The approved standard that makes the difference between people is never biological belonging, language, race, culture, status, might or money; it is how closed and obedient you are to the Almighty Allah and his messenger peace be upon him. Hereby, the truth of “Charaff” has something to do with your spiritual knowledge, ethics and religious belonging rather than your family tree, social status, norms, history, and reputation. Otherwise, “nobility”/Charaff will ever remain one of the socio-historical myths that all truth seekers will ever fight against.
By: Abdelouahed OULGOUT
Forum: www.4truth.forumotion.com
Back to top Go down
saidkarim




Number of posts : 17
Registration date : 2009-04-21

The myth of nobility Empty
PostSubject: Re: The myth of nobility   The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeSun May 03, 2009 6:35 am

Salam,
This is a wonderful topic to provoke in the shade of the countless mistaken beliefs related unfortunately to Islam, the most human equality's provider religion. But while this religion is Heavingly protected more than any other, people (especially young ones) have started to open their eyes towards the bright side.. The Truth.
Thank you brother for the beautiful contribution.
Back to top Go down
redford20




Male
Number of posts : 6
Job/hobbies : STUDENT
Registration date : 2008-11-30

The myth of nobility Empty
PostSubject: Re: The myth of nobility   The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeFri May 15, 2009 1:03 pm

xX true friendship Xx



hey guys it's me again
this is a poem about real and true friendship

ENJOY

when we miss something we don't know how to have it back
we can't forget how sad was that
can't forget our past
forget the happy times we had
when we lost someone and can't bring him back
we'll really feel how we were trying so hard
trying not to be away even for a sec
you may live far away from the reach of my sight
and it really makes me feeling so sad
makes me feel like i'm living in the dark
but
a real friendship can end all of that
because true friendship will never fade
so hopefully you'll understand after reading that
that you are so close no matter how far you are

Back to top Go down
redford20




Male
Number of posts : 6
Job/hobbies : STUDENT
Registration date : 2008-11-30

The myth of nobility Empty
PostSubject: Re: The myth of nobility   The myth of nobility Icon_minitimeFri May 15, 2009 1:21 pm

Assimilation (from Latin assimilatio; "to render similar") may refer to more than one article:

· Assimilation (linguistics), a linguistic process by which a sound becomes similar to an adjacent sound

· Cultural assimilation, the process whereby a minority group gradually adopts the customs and attitudes of the prevailing culture

o Language shift or language assimilation, the progressive process whereby a speech community of a language shifts to speaking another language

o Americanization (of Native Americans), cultural assimilation of Native Americans in the United States

o Jewish assimilation

· Assimilation (biology), the conversion of nutrient into the fluid or solid substance of the body, by the processes of digestion and absorption

· Assimilation (meteorology), the process of objectively adapting the model state (of a numerical weather prediction model) to observations in a statistical optimal way taking into account model and observation errors.

· Assimilation (philosophy), incorporation of new concepts into existing schemes

· Assimilation (sociology), the blending or fusing of minority groups into the dominant society

· Assimilating race in science fiction

o Assimilation (Star Trek), process used by the fictional Star Trek Borg race to integrate a being into their collective structure

o Biological assimilation is also used by the Zerg in the StarCraft series as a way of incorporating the genetics of other species into their own genepool.

o In Superman, assimilation is the method of being stabbed or injected with kryptonite

· In psychoanalysis, a mutual penetration of conscious and unconscious contents

· In Piagetian developmental psychology, one of the twin processes whereby concepts are modified (along with accommodation)

· In computer science, the modification of anti-virus software to detect a new virus

· In typesetting, the symmetry property possessed in varying degrees by a typeface that creates mirror relationships and other similarities of form between letters

Cultural assimilation.

It is the process by which individuals or groups are absorbed into and adopt the dominant culture and society of another group. The term assimilation is generally used with regard to immigrants to a new land, such as the various ethnic groups who have settled in the United States. New customs and attitudes are acquired through contact and communication. The transfer of customs is not simply a one-way process. Each group of immigrants contributes some of its own cultural traits to its new society. Assimilation usually involves a gradual change and takes place in varying degrees; full assimilation occurs when new members of a society become indistinguishable from older members.See Acculturation.

Assimilation is a common phonological process by which the phonetics of a speech segment becomes more like that of another segment in a word (or at a word boundary). A common example of assimilation would be "don't be silly" where the /n/ and /t/ in "don't" become /m/ and /p/, where said naturally in many accents and discourse styles ("dombe silly"). Assimilation can be synchronic being an active process in a language at a given point in time or diachronic being a historical sound change.

A related process is coarticulation where one segment influences another to produce an allophonic variation, such as vowels acquiring the feature nasal before nasal consonants when the velum opens prematurely or /b/ becoming labialised as in "boot". This article will describe both processes under the term, assimilation.

The physiological or psychological mechanisms of coarticulation are unknown, but we often loosely speak of a segment as "triggering" an assimilatory change in another segment. In assimilation, the phonological patterning of the language, discourse styles and accent are some of the factors contributing to changes observed.

There are four configurations found in assimilations: the increase in phonetic similarity may be between adjacent segments, or between segments separated by one or more intervening segments; and the changes may be in reference to a preceding segment, or to a following one. Although all four occur, changes in regard to a following adjacent segment account for virtually all assimilatory changes (and most of the regular ones). Also, assimilations to an adjacent segment are vastly more frequent than assimilations to a non-adjacent one. (These radical asymmetries might contain hints about the mechanisms involved, but they are unobvious.)

If a sound changes with reference to a following segment, it is traditionally called "regressive assimilation"; changes with reference to a preceding segment are traditionally called "progressive". Many find these terms confusing, as they seem to mean the opposite of the intended meaning. Accordingly, a variety of alternative terms have arisen—not all of which avoid the problem of the traditional terms. Regressive assimilation is also known as right-to-left, leading or anticipatory assimilation. Progressive assimilation is also known as left-to-right or perseveratory or preservative, lagging or lag assimilation. The terms anticipatory and lag will be used here.

Very occasionally two sounds (invariably adjacent) may influence one another in reciprocal assimilation. When such a change results in a single segment with some of the features of both components, it is known as coalescence or fusion.

Some authorities distinguish between partial and complete assimilation, i.e., between assimilatory changes in which there remains some phonetic difference between the segments involved, and those in which all differences are obliterated. There is no theoretical advantage to such a classification, as one of the following examples will show.

Tonal languages may exhibit tone assimilation (tonal umlaut, in effect), while sign languages also exhibit assimilation when the characteristics of neighbouring phonemes may be mixed.

Sign language is not universal. Like spoken languages, sign languages emerge naturally in communities and change through time. The following list is grouped into three sections:

· Deaf sign languages, which are the preferred languages of Deaf communities around the world;

· Signed modes of spoken languages, also known as Manually Coded Languages;

· Auxiliary sign systems, which are not "native" languages, but are signed systems of varying complexity used in addition to native languages. Simple gestures are not considered auxiliary sign systems for the purposes of this page.

The list is sorted alphabetically and regionally, and such groupings should not be taken to imply any genetic relationships between the languages (see List of language families).[1]
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





The myth of nobility Empty
PostSubject: Re: The myth of nobility   The myth of nobility Icon_minitime

Back to top Go down
 
The myth of nobility
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Edward Said, "The Myth of the Clash of Civilizations" 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
English Committee for Dialogue and Communication :: Your contributions :: Articles-
Jump to:  
Comments: 0
Keywords